Latest news:
In The Press - Kuits Continues to Grow21-May-2012
TheBusinessDesk.com LAW firm Kuits has announced two new hires and four promotions. The Man..
Can a Debtor prevent Charging Orders?14-May-2012
A previous article looked at whether a Judgment Creditor can apply for and obtain a Charging Ord..
Employers Preparing for the 2012 Olympics14-May-2012
The 2012 Olympics will create a number of issues for employers, including high levels of authori..
Employment Law Update - May 201214-May-2012
Supreme Court Rules on the Justification of Forced Retirement In the recent case of Seldon v Cla..
Queen's Speech Fails to Deal with Care Funding14-May-2012
A draft Bill to overhaul care for elderly and disabled people was announced in the Queen’s..
TheBusinessDesk.com - Sterling Green raises £10m for oil & gas move14-May-2012
STERLING Green Group is to move into the oil & gas business after raising £10m and buy..
UK Cookie Regulations - A Tough Cookie for Website Providers14-May-2012
By 26th May 2012 the UK Cookie Regulations will be enforced. If your website is non-compliant, y..
Does Copyright exist in TV Formats?11-May-2012
There is little protection for the creation of TV formats under law and as a result others can r..
Young Entrepreneur Launches Music and Lifestyle Brand09-May-2012
Kuits entertainment and media lawyers have advised 20 year old North West entrepreneur Becky Bro..
Manchester Evening News - Kuits US Mission03-May-2012
Lawyers from Kuits Solicitors are hoping to play their part in luring fast-growing American comp..
Testimonials
"The results are always exemplary. Kuits performance has clearly added value to our business."
Clive Ashcroft, head of Legal Services, Land Securities PLC
"What do you mean I can't just knock it down?"
12-Jul-2011 A recent judgement by the Court of Appeal has changed the rules when it comes to demolitions and is likely to lead to additional costs and delays for projects including such work.The case of R (SAVE Britain’s Heritage) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2011), found that the majority of the ‘Demolition Direction’, which excluded the demolition of certain categories of building from the need for approval, was unlawful and no longer applied. Accordingly in most instances now the demolition of any building will require planning permission or prior approval. The existing exemptions for buildings with a volume less than 50 cubic metres or enclosures (e.g. gates, walls) remain for the moment, although these too are under review.
If an existing planning permission does not permit demolition, then the prior notification procedure will need to be followed. This consists initially of an application to the local planning authority in order to confirm if prior approval is, in fact, required, which could take up to 28 days. If prior approval is required then there is a further 8 week application process.
In addition, in cases of significant or major demolition, there is a strong possibility that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will be required, and almost certainly if the works involve asbestos removal or the demolition of ex-industrial buildings. Therefore on all large demolitions the Developer will have to undertake EIA screening in order to satisfy the local planning authority the potential environmental impact has been considered.
Finally, it should be noted that if there is to be any delay between demolition and the subsequent redevelopment, a local planning authority has the power to require reasonable steps to be taken for the interim remediation of the site.
In light of the above, any development programme which includes demolition works will need to make adequate provision for the potential additional delays in obtaining approval (including, if applicable, the EIA) and developers will need to be aware of the associated costs.
If you would like any more information on the impact of the ‘SAVE’ case, please contact Simon Franklin.
| Ask a Question... |
| Request a Call Back... |
| What our Clients Say... |

Comment